Am I the only one that sees a pattern on that website? ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Newtons Massmind" To: "'Microcontroller discussion list - Public.'" Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 3:02 PM Subject: [OT] Physics denies official 9/11 report. > Sonoma State University's "Project Censored" has an EXECELLET summary of > what is wrong with the official 9/11 WTC reports. The wild conspiracy > theories do a lot of damage to the credibility of people who question the > official findings, but this write-up, summarizing a Brigham Young > University > physics professor, points out the specific physical issues that don't make > sense. > > http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2007/index.htm#18 > > E.g. ok, the towers had only a steel exoskeleton and perhaps that melted > enough for them to collapse, (perfectly straight down) but how did the > fully > steel framed Building 7 fall in 6.6 seconds after NOT being hit by > ANYTHING? > > > If the fire in that building caused one part of the steel to fail, at best > one floor would have collapsed on to the next. The impact of that floor on > the next would, must, slow the fall. You can clearly see this effect as > the > twin towers collapse. > > Yet an object dropped from a 7 story building will hit the ground in 6 > seconds. So are we saying that each of the 7 floors, hitting the floor > next > to it, only slowed the fall by .6 seconds? That is patently impossible. > > The only thing that accounts for that building hitting the ground in 6.6 > seconds is demolition charges being set to cut apart each of the steel > beams > on ALL the floors at the same time as is commonly done in controlled > building demolition. The owner of the WTC center is on video saying that > the > fire department "pulled" building 7 because it could not fight the fire in > it. He later recanted that testimony. > > If it was demo'd, how could the charges have been set from inside the > building, on every beam, on every floor, during a raging fire? > > The only explanation is that building 7 was rigged for demolition PRIOR to > 9/11. > > WTC 7 housed offices of the U.S. Secret Service, the Department of > Defense, > the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the U.S. Securities and > Exchange > Commission, the Mayor's Office of Emergency Management, the Internal > Revenue > Service Regional Council, and the Central Intelligence Agency. Many of the > records from the Enron accounting scandal were destroyed when the building > came down. > > The official findings of the 9/11 commission address building 7 only by > saying that they have no idea what happened to it. > > And yet, during all the massive media coverage of 9/11, Building 7 was > mentioned only in passing. The repeated attempts to raise these questions > has resulted in no reasonable response from any supporters of the official > record. > > But the 9/11 "attack" did move the nation to support the invasion of Iraq > by > the USA, preventing Iraq from effectively selling oil below OPEC rates to > European countries and, of course, precipitating the subsequent > Halliburton > profits. > > http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2007/index.htm#17 "Iraq Invasion > Promotes OPEC Agenda" > http://techref.massmind.org/techref/other/war4oil.htm > http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/09/26/politics/main575356.shtml > "Cheney's Halliburton Ties Remain" > http://techref.massmind.org/techref/other/911profit.htm "Someone sold > short > on the 9/11 airlines" > > "Naturally, the common people don't want war, but after all, it is the > leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple > matter to drag people along, whether it is democracy, or a fascist > dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no > voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. > This > is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and > denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to > danger. It works the same in every country" > -- Hermann Goering, Hitlers Reich-Marshal at Nuremburg after WWII. > http://techref.massmind.org/techref/other/war-machine.htm > > Now, everything in this email is a verifiable, unarguable fact. The > conclusions drawn are obvious (to me) based on the data presented, and I > admit that I pulled in only select data, but I will be happy to recant > them > in the face of some new data to the contrary. Therefore, this is not a > religious or a political post. > > --- > James. > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.3/561 - Release Date: 12/1/2006 > > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist