Sonoma State University's "Project Censored" has an EXECELLET summary of
what is wrong with the official 9/11 WTC reports. The wild conspiracy
theories do a lot of damage to the credibility of people who question the
official findings, but this write-up, summarizing a Brigham Young University
physics professor, points out the specific physical issues that don't make
sense. 

http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2007/index.htm#18

E.g. ok, the towers had only a steel exoskeleton and perhaps that melted
enough for them to collapse, (perfectly straight down) but how did the fully
steel framed Building 7 fall in 6.6 seconds after NOT being hit by ANYTHING?


If the fire in that building caused one part of the steel to fail, at best
one floor would have collapsed on to the next. The impact of that floor on
the next would, must, slow the fall. You can clearly see this effect as the
twin towers collapse. 

Yet an object dropped from a 7 story building will hit the ground in 6
seconds. So are we saying that each of the 7 floors, hitting the floor next
to it, only slowed the fall by .6 seconds? That is patently impossible. 

The only thing that accounts for that building hitting the ground in 6.6
seconds is demolition charges being set to cut apart each of the steel beams
on ALL the floors at the same time as is commonly done in controlled
building demolition. The owner of the WTC center is on video saying that the
fire department "pulled" building 7 because it could not fight the fire in
it. He later recanted that testimony. 

If it was demo'd, how could the charges have been set from inside the
building, on every beam, on every floor, during a raging fire?

The only explanation is that building 7 was rigged for demolition PRIOR to
9/11.

WTC 7 housed offices of the U.S. Secret Service, the Department of Defense,
the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, the Mayor's Office of Emergency Management, the Internal Revenue
Service Regional Council, and the Central Intelligence Agency. Many of the
records from the Enron accounting scandal were destroyed when the building
came down.

The official findings of the 9/11 commission address building 7 only by
saying that they have no idea what happened to it.

And yet, during all the massive media coverage of 9/11, Building 7 was
mentioned only in passing. The repeated attempts to raise these questions
has resulted in no reasonable response from any supporters of the official
record.

But the 9/11 "attack" did move the nation to support the invasion of Iraq by
the USA, preventing Iraq from effectively selling oil below OPEC rates to
European countries and, of course, precipitating the subsequent Halliburton
profits.

http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2007/index.htm#17 "Iraq Invasion
Promotes OPEC Agenda"
http://techref.massmind.org/techref/other/war4oil.htm 
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/09/26/politics/main575356.shtml
"Cheney's Halliburton Ties Remain"
http://techref.massmind.org/techref/other/911profit.htm "Someone sold short
on the 9/11 airlines"

"Naturally, the common people don't want war, but after all, it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple
matter to drag people along, whether it is democracy, or a fascist
dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no
voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. This
is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and
denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to
danger. It works the same in every country" 
-- Hermann Goering, Hitlers Reich-Marshal at Nuremburg after WWII. 
http://techref.massmind.org/techref/other/war-machine.htm

Now, everything in this email is a verifiable, unarguable fact. The
conclusions drawn are obvious (to me) based on the data presented, and I
admit that I pulled in only select data, but I will be happy to recant them
in the face of some new data to the contrary. Therefore, this is not a
religious or a political post.

---
James.
 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist