The point I was trying to make with the "drivel" was what I was trying to 
accomplish with the PIC.  I thought maybe I might be going about it wrong. 
Maybe someone could point out a better way to do it. It sometimes helps to 
know what the end goal is.
I have apologized for my original post and I'm tired of this nit-picking.
Thank you
"this guy"

----- Original Message -----
From: "Olin Lathrop" <olin_piclist@embedinc.com>
To: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <piclist@mit.edu>
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: [PIC] critique

> Mike Singer wrote:
>> It's easy, just insert some line breaks:
>
> That would have been a good start, but there was too much drivel in there.
> Something about a spotlight, then a DJ booth, then a standby button.  In
> other words, way too much irrelevant detail.  I got to where he said
> something about a 12F675 monitoring a audio stream, immediately following
> some babble about a standby button when I gave up.  Perhaps some of the
> drivel was actually useful background information, but I guess I'll never
> know.
>
> Visual presentation format is important, but a clearly thought out
> presentation order with context always kept in mind is important too. 
> This
> guy had neither.
>
>
> ********************************************************************
> Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, http://www.embedinc.com/products
> (978) 742-9014.  Gold level PIC consultants since 2000.
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> 
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist