> I'm sorry, but considering the task at hand, and your apparent knowledge
> of power design you should NOT be surprised that many here don't think
> it's a good idea for you to go down this path.


Why do people fixate like this on THE ONE SOLUTION, when they have competent
people advising them that their solution is unworkable?

I've seen this before when someone, usually from marketing, comes in and
tells us "we need this". It's usually some way off the wall requirement, and
they WILL NOT let go of it despite small objections like that it might defy
the laws of physics, or some other niggling little engineering thing.

"We need 16 bit technology!"  The product was moving packets of a couple
hundred bytes over a 212A modem.. The host was 7E1 and that wouldn't ever
change.

"We need 1M of SRAM in this <$100 product".  At the time, 1M of SRAM cost
about $400 just in chips on the table.  It also was VASTLY more than was
ever needed by the end users.
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist