Strange, I have a box of connectors at home that says RJ-12 on it... Microchip calls it an RJ-12: http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/51265g.pdf Some more links referring to RJ-12: http://midondesign.com/TEMP08/P13RJ11vsRJ12.html Also, the Wiki article does mention an RJ-12. Just says it's not common. On 10/24/06, Rolf wrote: > > I posted a note on piclist a while back with a similar issue.... My ICD2 > only works if the plug is pushed in further into the jack than just the > "click". You need to push it that extra mm more. > > Otehrwise it is an excercise in frustration. I guess the jacks used by > Microchip are slightly non-conformant with standards. > > For the record, I figured Olin's pedantic reply about his ICD2 not > having an RJ12 plug was worth investigating, and it appears he is right. > > ICD2 s do NOT have RJ12 jacks. There apparently is no such thing > specified. An RJ11 jack is a 6p2c modular plug, an RJ14 is 6p4c, and an > RJ25 is 6p6c. > > Thus, the closest "RJ" match is RJ25. But, then, it is not really a > pertinent naming convention since the ICD2 is not telephony equiptment, > thus, the best descriptor fot the ICD2 would be a 6p6c modular Jack. > > Go figure. > > See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Registered_jack > > Rolf > > Shawn Wilton wrote: > > Thank you for the suggestions guys, but I think most of you > misunderstood my > > issue. My complaint is the RJ-12 ON the ICD2. Not the other end of the > > cable. I have plenty of custom programming cables, but last couple of > days > > I've been having to hold the RJ-12 connector on the ICD2. Lousy design. > > Those connectors s***. > > > > > > > > On 10/24/06, Tamas Rudnai wrote: > > > >> The only thing is that a pin header is not polarized. Also PicKit2 has > a 6 > >> pin connector -- it is not a problem as you can use it with the 5 pin > one > >> but... > >> > >> Anyway, what's wrong with the RJ12? Is that something like a contact > >> problem > >> or just the bad taste of having a telephony socket on your programmer? > >> > >> Tamas > >> > >> > >> > >> On 24/10/06, Mike Harrison wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 21:46:28 -0700, you wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Has anyone found a reasonable solution for dealing with the > ridiculous > >>>> > >>> RJ-12 > >>> > >>>> jack on the Microchip ICD2 other than to remove it, add wires and > >>>> > >>> "install" > >>> > >>>> a new header of sorts? > >>>> > >>> Yes - I've standardised on a Molex 5-pin header, chopping the RJ off > the > >>> end of the cable. > >>> Handy hint to save time - write the pin names on the connector. > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > >>> View/change your membership options at > >>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> unPIC -- The PIC Disassembler > >> http://unpic.sourceforge.net > >> -- > >> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > >> View/change your membership options at > >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- Shawn Wilton (b9 Systems) http://b9Systems.com <- New web page -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist