--- peter green wrote: > what are you using theese counts for? Sounds like they want to check up on ticket sales vs cars in/cars out. > do in cars and out cars take different routes? Yep. > > what accuracy do you need (e.g. what proportion of counts can you afford to > gain/lose before the data becomes useless to you) Basically, want to log all cars. The vehicles will be pretty close to the sensor and slow moving (<15 k/h) so should give big magnetic sig? Path width should be, say, <5metres. It's a sports event - as the car park fills up, they move the poles, path and traffic wardens someplace else. Ditto car counter. So you probly don't want a gizmo that needs turf dug up or dangles loops or is fiddly to align. I'm thinking magnetic would be the way to go? Those Honeywell sensors have analogue o/p but that wouldn't be a big drama. Thanks -Debbie ____________________________________________________ On Yahoo!7 Answers: Share what you know and you might make someone's day http://www.yahoo7.com.au/answers -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist