> This is actually a reaction drive because it is based on reaction (reactive) > force, unless I missed something in the description. In the regular "jet" > engine the reactive force is provided by expulsion of matter, in this case by > expulsion of wave, somewhat similar to photonic drive (a-la startrek etc.). > What they mean is the drive has no momentum because it has no moving parts. Or, better, reaction MASS-less drive. It uses no reaction mass to provide thrust. Which is EXCELLENT, because most forms of propulsion these days (rocket, jet, etc.) require quite a bit of reaction mass. > Also, they have a picture of an aircraft using this type of engine to provide > hoover capability. I bet amount of microwave radiation it will produce will > wreak havoc on electronic equipment below the craft. The end goal is to have nearly none of that microwave radiation leaking out of the chamber. The energy poured into the chamber would go into lift, with very little (remember the goal of a Q in the billions) leaking out. If my physics logic is right, once a craft reached altitude, the amount of energy required to keep it there would be minimal. After all, energy is force integrated over distance. If the distance being travelled is zero (no net motion up or down in the gravitational field), the only energy that would have to be placed into the "bottle" would be to replace leakage, and with a Q of several billion, that's not much. I don't see this making flying cars a reality, but imagine the applications in trade. A ship is loaded with trinkets in Hong Kong, a generator on shore is used to provide the initial umph to lever it up out of the water, onboard generation good enough to KEEP it up takes over, then it zips across the ocean to California or where ever. Or to science: a satellite using this could maintain a geosynchronous "orbit" at any altitude! Power generation: those LEO geosync satellites could beam down the excess energy they capture to local power stations. The possibilities are endless: what this represents is nothing less than the means to build a structure at any height from the surface of the Earth, without the need for physical contact with the Earth. HUGE. That's if it works. Something about it seems not quite right to me. ;-) Mike H. -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist