I do not know the rest of the code, but stack underflow... something is
definitely strange there. Have to see the entire code to say something wise.
And I agree that just moving the table somewhere else is not a solution,
just eliminating the symptoms (and maybe to generate other errors that a
simulator will not bring up).

Tamas


On 08/09/06, Timothy Weber <tw@timothyweber.org> wrote:
>
> Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:
> > Timothy Weber wrote :
> >
> >> Excellent!  As Jan-Erik says, that indicates that you need to work
> > on
> >> your linker map or segment allocation in general...
> >
> > No, that was not what I said. And I do not (currently) think
> > that's a problem. I think there is a piece of code that doesn't
> > "end" or "returns" as it should, so the processor runs out in
> > the wild after that code segment.
>
> Sorry, didn't mean to misquote you - I just agree that something else is
> amiss there and needs to be checked out.
> --
> Timothy J. Weber
> http://timothyweber.org
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>



-- 
unPIC -- The PIC Disassembler
http://unpic.sourceforge.net
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist