Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:
> Timothy Weber wrote :
> 
>> Excellent!  As Jan-Erik says, that indicates that you need to work 
> on
>> your linker map or segment allocation in general...
> 
> No, that was not what I said. And I do not (currently) think
> that's a problem. I think there is a piece of code that doesn't
> "end" or "returns" as it should, so the processor runs out in
> the wild after that code segment.

Sorry, didn't mean to misquote you - I just agree that something else is 
amiss there and needs to be checked out.
-- 
Timothy J. Weber
http://timothyweber.org
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist