Timothy Weber wrote :

> Excellent!  As Jan-Erik says, that indicates that you need to work 
on
> your linker map or segment allocation in general...

No, that was not what I said. And I do not (currently) think
that's a problem. I think there is a piece of code that doesn't
"end" or "returns" as it should, so the processor runs out in
the wild after that code segment.

Moving the table out of the way, just means that the code might
run straigt into something else, giving some other strange error.

> so that it doesn't bite you in the future.  Then you can put the
> table wherever it makes the most readable sense in the code.

Yes, when the bug inte code has been located and fixed.

Jan-Erik.



-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist