> > That fails the species test for a start (as do the faces on 
> the signs 
> > they show),
> 
> I don't see that as a major genuine disadvantage.
> Odds of spacethingies coming here after we expire and within 
> sensible time periods is small given almost any world view.
> 
> And I suspect that the odds of any interstellar space faring 
> race having problems working out what is buried on this site 
> without any clues at all is vanishingly small.
> 
> 
>         Russell 


Or as the report says, leave nothing at all.  As they say, monuments attract
attention.  

I know if I spot a large black slab of granite-like stuff, I'll be checking
it out.  Even if it's on the moon.  With explosives, if need be.  (as per
Asimov's 'The Sentinal'.)

I like they idea of burying waste deep in salt flats.  Works for witches &
warlocks, nuke waste shouldn't be a problem.  It's not as if you'll be
growing corn there.

Put up a few wooden posts, these might last 100 years.  After that...

Tony

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist