> >         'waste?, what waste?".
>
> But this is what has been done with fossil fuels. Air pollution, lung
> cancer, lead poisoning, are all being ignored. Not to mention global
> warming, which is (apparently) influenced more by the greenhouse gases than
> the actual energy release.
>
> At least with Nukes, people take the waste seriously. The problem is that
> they are not making a fair comparison with the waste from other energy
> sources.

At least in the case of nuclear waste, it all comes out solid, and in one place.
That's more than one can say for many of the by-products of other energy
generation methods.

Mike H.
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist