You can probably set one of them up in "infrastructure" mode - this should allow exactly what you want. I don't see a reason to bitch and scream at comcast though. On 8/30/06, David VanHorn wrote: > > > > > > IR emitter/receiver pairs? They are not visible normally. For just 10' > > they don't even need to be modulated. > > I have seen T1 chips mux at 100M speeds. > > > Hm. Might work. I'm not a big fan of IR, (irda experience.. ) and I don't > need another development project. > > Otherwise, why not just bury the wires? They can't track down > > everything, can they? Its not illegal to run > > wires between buildings on your own property. What are they thinking? > > > It's two street addresses.. They don't claim that it's illegal (unlike > their > guy vandalizing my equipment) but that they won't allow it. > If they cut my LDF4-50, that's going to be expensive. > I'm sure that Pasternak will sell me a replacement I can bill to them. > Somewhere in the garage I have some oval waveguide for 10 GHz I could put > up.. > > I was more looking to trick one wifi router into letting the wireless > connection be the WAN instead of the wire. > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist