On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 20:51 +0200, Wouter van Ooijen wrote:
> >>> Only right at the end did I discover it was a compiler bug.
>  
> >> Why, do you usually keep looking once you discover it's a 
> >> compiler bug?
> 
> > I don't really understand the question? I think the answer is 
> > yes, since usually once I discover a tool issue, the next step 
> > is either solving the tool issue ...
> 
> Didn't you notice the implied smile? 

I guess not, I'm not sure why not, just didn't occur to me.

> IMO discovering (anything) is
> always the end of the search (at least the end of the search for that).

Absolutely not IMHO, at least in the realm of bug fixing. Finding the
source of a bug can often be only half the effort. Actually, more often
then not FIXING the bug is more work then finding it.

TTYL

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist