> The descendant of this program - pretty similar, I think - uses 925
> words in BoostC.  As I recall, it was also around 1K in PICC Lite, and
> around 2K in mikroC.

Sounds like BoostC and HiTech are both about as efficient as you can get,
without user intervention.

When I put LCDTerm on the web I wanted to make sure it would compile with
PICCLITE, and noticed that it used about 5% more ROM than the paid-for
version of HiTech C. Ram usage was the same between the two.

Cheers,

Bob


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist