> Though - The hex file was, according to my notes, *twice* as large as
> one generated from substantially similar code (except for what needed to
> be changed for porting) by BoostC.

Perhaps there was different padding in the hex file - was the actual
rom/ram usage double?

Also, if it was a small enough test, the differences in startup routines
could account for it, yet be insignificant in a larger program.

It'd be interesting to look at disassembled code from different compilers.

Cheerful regards,

Bob


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist