On 8/18/06, Vasile Surducan wrote: > I'm not very sure, but it want to be a sort of alternative to WIMAX. > > http://www.xgtechnology.com/about.asp > > The site is very unfriendly with the XG standard information, I > remeber i've read an article somewhere about a demonstration where > two journalists has been invited to see a link covering a large area > with a small power transciever using a sort of QAM. The transciever > was mounted in a top of 30 or 50m tower and they claimed the > transmitter power was less than 50mW. Nobody measured that, say the > journalists. As long there isn't a standard, it does not exist. > yes, I remembered well and found the article: http://news.zdnet.co.uk/communications/wireless/0,39020348,39235645,00.htm -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist