Wouter van Ooijen wrote:
>> If you send me one, I'll test it.
>>     
>
> will do
>
>   
>> Are you interested in the lower price or for the less space ?
>>     
>
> first less space, second less components (no capacitors), third less PCB
> hassle (xtal can short top traces), lower price is third (my source for
> xtals and resonators is quite cheap anyway).
>
>   
Actually, _MY_ preference for resonators is due to the improvement in 
shock capabilities (the main
reason they are used in TV IR remote controls). A resonator can absorb 
10x the shock of a crystal,
and a cracked crystal causes a problem very difficult to troubleshoot.

--Bob

>> BTW the circuit is rock stable now,
>> (10000 pings, without a single error, using 6 meter of cable)
>> using yours LF1S022, so you may drop the "probably" on your site ;-)
>> I also use 47 Ohm resistors instead of the 49 Ohm 1%, no problem.
>> As soon as the last compiler bugs are solved, I'll publish everything.
>>     
>
> nice, then I'll try it on the board I am working on now. the
> pickit2-clone part seems to be working now (no more "USB device not
> recognised").
>
> Wouter van Ooijen
>
> -- -------------------------------------------
> Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
> consultancy, development, PICmicro products
> docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu
>  
>
>   

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist