On 8/2/06, Richard Le Mesurier wrote: > Hi, I've been reading the digest for a couple of weeks, and trying to > get started on pic'ing without much luck. I feel its time to ask you > guys some newbie questions. I am using PIC 16f84a, WinXP, learning from > www and course book from local university (Cape Tech, South Africa). > > 1) I am trying to build a programmer off the www. In replies from the > list to someone else recently, it seems that this is a bad idea. > Can anyone here vouch for the following designs that they should work? > PPWin hardware - www.semis.demon.co.uk/Pics/ppwincct.bmp this one is ok > Oshonsoft hardware - www.oshonsoft.com/picprog.html > They are Tait designs, and differ only in the fact that Oshonsoft uses > more caps. (I think) > Both boards are giving the correct voltages on the pic pins during > software testing as below. > > 2) WinXP abstracts the LPT ports. So I downloaded 2 different LPT > drivers - can you guys vouch for them? > GiveIO.sys > UserPort.sys > I found GiveIO works, at least under test. > > 3) I am trying 2 different softwares, both get good reviews on this > list, but not sure about their compatibility with XP and the above > drivers - anyone know? > ICProg ver 1.05d (also 1.05c) works ok, but you have first to "setting/option/misc/enable XP driver" no auxiliary lpt driver necessary a faster programmer software (pair with the hardware mentioned) is http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/winpicpr.html > FPP ver 0.9 build 43 > Anyone know correct FPP settings for the boards mentioned above? > I can get the software to change the correct LPT1 pin outs as required, > using their test modes and multimeter, but have no oscilloscope to check > while programming. > > Since voltages on pins seem correct under test conditions I am starting > to think there are timing problems maybe under programming conditions. > Could there be a synchronisation problem with the board under XP using > these drivers? Is there a way to test if MCLR rises fast enough to 12.5V > without using scope? > > Am at a loss, and can't afford "real" programmer for a few months, but I > have all the time and dedication in the world (i.e. unemployed...). Any > advice appreciated. > > Of course I could change to a "better" pic and use bootloader, but that > requires one have a programmer working to put the boot code on first > with. Chick'n'egg situation... > > Thanks > Richard > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist