Dear Rob,

Thanks for taking the time.

I think it needs as Olin says some waving with a dead fish, phases of 
moon. :-)

Mohit.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rob Hamerling" <digithalys@gmail.com>
To: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <piclist@mit.edu>
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:05 AM
Subject: Re: [PIC] xwisp2 & Wisp628 - Slight inconvenience


> Hi Mohit,
>
> On 7/26/06, Mohit M. (Lists) <mohit.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 1. Changing the pullup to 33K doesn't help.
>
> Then there must be something else.....
>
>> 2. The log file is really long. Will you need all of it or just the
>> start and end bits that are inline below?
>
> That was indeed enough. Unfortunately it doesn't give me a clue...
>
> Hopefully suggestions of others will help.
>
> Regards, Rob.
>
> Once I built a Wisp628 myself on experiment board. It did not work
> properly with a 16F648A,  but worked OK with a 16F628[A]. After a 
> long
> search I finally found that I had forgotten the 100 nF decoupler
> cap......  You may have a similar (not so) trivial error..
>
>
> -- 
> Rob Hamerling, Vianen NL (http://www.robh.nl/)
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist