On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 07:44:30PM +0200, Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:
> Brooke Clarke wrote :
> 
> > Hi Jan-Erik:
> > 
> > The reason I'm waiting for the 16F91x is that it has the Nano Watt 
> > feature set which the 16F87x does not.
> > In particular the clock fail features.
> 
> Yes, that's absolutely one of the "pros".
> I was more interested in "cons"... :-)
> 
> Such as missing peripherials vs. 877A.

I guess I would put my concerns in the form of this question:

Is there a 28/40 pin equivalent to the 16F88. Specifically:

1) Self-programmable
2) Similar peripheral set
3) Nano-watt capable

I thought the 16F777 was going to be it, but it doesn't have
enchanced flash, so it isn't self programmable.

BAJ
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist