Oops ...
Gaston Gagnon wrote:
> Olin Lathrop wrote:
>   
>>> Since the problem -- according to you -- seems to be pretty much only your
>>> (or your ISP's) POP3 server (nobody else complained about a truncated
>>> line), maybe the really bad idea is to rely on a broken POP3 server?
>>>     
>>>       
>> You forget that I'm not the one with the problem.  Someone else wanted my
>> free help and his message didn't get thru intact and he therefore didn't
>> receive free help from me.  I explained how he could fix that and you went
>> into this tirade about standards.
>>
>>   
>>     
>
> Reproduced from your previous post:
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> craig@ivibe.com wrote:
>
>   
>>> Hello all, we are trying to avoid the need for a gang programmer for
>>> using the 18F4550 in TQFP package.  So we want to add the in-circuit
>>> serial option to our PCB so the chips can be programmed in-circuit.
>>> The problem is that there is no part value spcifi
>>>
>>> Does anyone know the part value to use?  The part that we need to know
>>> the value of is in Figure 1.
>>>       
>>   
>>     
>
> As you can see, your email message makes no sense because you sent each
> paragraph as a single long line, and it got truncated at 256 characters
> somewhere between your mailer and mine.  All transports and mail clients can
> handle messages sent as plain text with lines not exceeding 80 characters.
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> What 256 characters? Olin, if my counting is wright, the lines are truncated after 68 characters !!!!
>
>
> Gaston Gagnon
>
>   
I forgot to limit my line length at 80 characters ;o)

What 256 characters? Olin, if my counting is wright, the lines are truncated
after 68 characters !!!!

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist