Olin Lathrop wrote:
>> Since the problem -- according to you -- seems to be pretty much only your
>> (or your ISP's) POP3 server (nobody else complained about a truncated
>> line), maybe the really bad idea is to rely on a broken POP3 server?
>>     
>
> You forget that I'm not the one with the problem.  Someone else wanted my
> free help and his message didn't get thru intact and he therefore didn't
> receive free help from me.  I explained how he could fix that and you went
> into this tirade about standards.
>
>   

Reproduced from your previous post:
________________________________________________________________________

craig@ivibe.com wrote:

> > Hello all, we are trying to avoid the need for a gang programmer for
> > using the 18F4550 in TQFP package.  So we want to add the in-circuit
> > serial option to our PCB so the chips can be programmed in-circuit.
> > The problem is that there is no part value spcifi
> >
> > Does anyone know the part value to use?  The part that we need to know
> > the value of is in Figure 1.
>   

As you can see, your email message makes no sense because you sent each
paragraph as a single long line, and it got truncated at 256 characters
somewhere between your mailer and mine.  All transports and mail clients can
handle messages sent as plain text with lines not exceeding 80 characters.
________________________________________________________________________

What 256 characters? Olin, if my counting is wright, the lines are truncated after 68 characters !!!!


Gaston Gagnon

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist