I do notice it, and I find it a little annoying to have new threads
started as replies of old threads.
Basing threads on reply-to IDs is the proper way of sorting threads,
where basing them on subject works most of the time, as long as noone
changes the subject title. I run my own email archive; I know.
--
Martin K

Olin Lathrop wrote:

>Peter wrote:
>  
>
>>That is because the rest of us have been gnashing our teeth quietly.
>>    
>>
>
>Please don't speak for everyone.  I certainly have not been gnashing any
>teeth over this, nor even noticed this.  I think it only affects those
>people who want to see a thread view and then use it as the only means of
>detecting a thread.  The PIClist archive is a good example of something that
>manages to figure out thread continuity quite well without everyone doing
>the thread ID thing.
>
>  
>
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist