--- Jan-Erik Soderholm <jan-erik.soderholm@telia.com>
wrote:

> Phillip wrote :
> 
> > ...if I get a special char I push the following
> chars in
> > a buffer to form strings...
> 
> And that is done in the *following* interrupts,
> right ?
> 
> Or are you staying *in* the ISR waiting for those
> "following chars" ? That is rather bad design, if
> so.
> 
> Generaly speaking, no ISR should ever *wait* for
> anything.
> 
> > I also agree that there is no real need to have a
> priority 
> > scheme now but I don't see what it hurts.
> 
> It adds complexity to the design, with is OK if you
> need it...
> 
> 
  Fortunately this requirement is a rare occurance. If
it locks itself in the ISR you can't get anywhere when
the BOR occurs. Therefore it should be eliminated. 

John

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist