I've been using them with PIC18 series for several years now.
I think they are the greatest thing since sliced bread.
The new ones have a MUCH higher serial bandwidth.
I can't get an answer from them on what buffering they have internally.
But with an average data rate at 56K, it seems to be fine.
(I have been aassured they work to 2M, in burst mode.)

Tom

  *
  |  __O    Thomas C. Sefranek  tcs@cmcorp.com
  |_-\<,_   Amateur Radio Operator: WA1RHP
  (*)/ (*)  Bicycle mobile on 145.41MHz PL74.4
 
ARRL Instructor, Technical Specialist, VE Contact.
http://hamradio.cmcorp.com/inventory/Inventory.html
http://www.harvardrepeater.org

-----Original Message-----
From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf Of
Andy Tuthill
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 12:05 AM
To: piclist@mit.edu
Subject: [PIC] Using Lantronix XPorts

I'm about to try to integrate the Lantronix XPort connector to an 18F252 for

ethernet capability.  To start with it will be talking with PC's using 
ethernet cards.

>From what I understand I simply set up the XPort as a transmitter and then 
the receiving end should be able to get my serial data.  The process is 
referred to as serial tunnelling.

Is it really that easy or is something waiting to put egg on my face when I 
try to make a guesstimate on how long it will take to deliver this feature?

If anyone else has experience with these I would appreciate some feedback.

Regards,
Andy


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist



-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist