On 6/24/06, Dave Lag wrote: > > Any interest in a [MSP] tag? > > > > James. > > I would welcome an MSP tag. > The yahoo group has some toolchain vendor representation > but overall IMO strike me as somewhat elitist and intolerant. > I'm not likely to ask a second question there. Do we really need another tag? Just look at the [AVR] tag... ARM is nice, do we need [ARM] tag? The problem is that it is not so easy to attract people to a new mailing list. As for the Yahoo MSP430 group, I always use Gmane to read it using a newgroup client like OE or Thunderbird. I do not use it so I have no questions to post yet. I agree that there are some people there kind of intolerant... And there is the Yahoo LPC2000 group. I think it is better than the Yahoo MSP430 group but stil there are vendors inside. I actually think it is a good thing to have vendors inside. PIClist is apparently very different that there are no obvious Microchip/HiTech people posting here. Regards, Xiaofan -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist