On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 02:16:47PM -0500, Mark Rages wrote:
> Sorry, forgot tags.

Another one of your mistakes? :)

> http://go.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=oddlyEnoughNews&storyID=12613851
> 
> This makes me feel better about my mistakes.

I'd be really interested in seeing the full report on that, what was
protecting that switch from being triggered, and for that matter, what
are the maintenance procedures around it anyway? Something tells me
regular testing is an interesting task...

-- 
pete@petertodd.ca http://www.petertodd.ca
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist