>
> Have Intel-made processors held a relevant part of the 8051 market 
> lately?

The loss of Intel 8051s is not so interesting, but this is the
death of the 251, 196, and 960 as ARCHITECTURES, isn't it?  I
don't think those were ever licensed to second sources (lots of
places did their own speed-enhanced 8051 cores, but not actual
80251s...)  (In a way, this shows how far behind Intel had fallen
in the microcontroller marketplace?  Have they really not had a
leading microcontroller since the original 8051?  Wow.)

BillW
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist