On 5/27/06, Vasile Surducan wrote: > On 5/25/06, Olin Lathrop wrote: > > Vasile Surducan wrote: > > >> I don't know since it has never been broken out. The parts we are using > > >> that are only for WiFi are pretty much just the compact flash > > >> connector and > > >> the compact flash WiFi card. > > > > > > Yes, but this means the RF project belongs to someone else, > > > > Exactly! Getting all those details right and properly certified by > > regulatory agencies is a *major* job. The volumes of compact flash Wifi > > cards are high enough that you can get them for a very reasonable markup > > over production cost. You really really don't want to try designing your > > own just to have WiFi connectivity in a bigger product. > > > > > you have > > > no control on that side and you depend from those RF design, BER, SNR, > > > etc, etc, etc. > > > > Right. Someone else has already invented the wheel, designed a product > > around it, dealt with the wheel police, and is producing them in volume at a > > good price. Since my end product just uses wheels to get a bigger job done, > > it would be really silly to try and design and produce my own. > > > > > As long you've change the RF part you must made changes in your > > > project too, including firmeare because there are many differences in > > > RF desighns even the connector is the same. > > > > I'm not quite sure what you are saying, but we are working with CF cards > > that all use the same popular chipset. > > > Intercept the RF with an atenna. Connect the antenna with a spectrum analyzer > (a real one not those made by PCMCIA WIFI card + a software program). > Change the CF WIMAX card WIFI (not yet WIMAX) and see what you'll see. > It's the same CF card, the same 802.11 standard and the way of flowing packs > are completely different, the SNR (or SFDR) is different, the EVM is > different and the efect you may see is just one: this CF works, the > other CF works too but > slowly, and closer to the router... > > Vasile > > > > > > > And again I don't think you're able to use the entire bandwith > > > (54Mbps) that 802.11 a/g recommend. > > > > No, and I don't want to. The overall datarate of this product is something > > a PIC can handle. The reason for WiFi is easier and cheaper installation. > > > > > > ****************************************************************** > > Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, (978) 742-9014. #1 PIC > > consultant in 2004 program year. http://www.embedinc.com/products > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > View/change your membership options at > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist