That is exactly the approach I want to use. Michael Rigby-Jones wrote: >-----Original Message----- >From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] >Sent: 24 May 2006 18:08 >To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. >Subject: Re: [PIC] WiFi & PIC > > >I totally agree. But he wants to know why not use it...so, >aside from the firmware overhead to support it, like to >estimate the cost differences as well. > How about using cheap unlicensed transceivers in the sensors that talk to a wifi equiped base-station? This could be an embedded PC to simplify code development and gives the wireless web browser access that he wants. Regards Mike ======================================================================= This e-mail is intended for the person it is addressed to only. The information contained in it may be confidential and/or protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you must not make any use of this information, or copy or show it to any person. Please contact us immediately to tell us that you have received this e-mail, and return the original to us. Any use, forwarding, printing or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. No part of this message can be considered a request for goods or services. ======================================================================= -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --------------------------------- Feel free to call! Free PC-to-PC calls. Low rates on PC-to-Phone. Get Yahoo! Messenger with Voice -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist