> The other is that developing custom firmware is expensive. This could be
> addressed by providing working modules for common applications. Not
> necessarily something they would have to provide, but something they could
> provide the infrastructure for it. If you're talking about replacing simple
> (but maybe more expensive or bigger) hardware solutions, this is an
> important part. Unless you're only looking at products that sell in the
> millions.
> 
> Gerhard

Having software that could write the code as you drag your logic 
blocks/gates to the screen? That would be great-might never use
TTL et al again.
(I presume this is what the software described in the FPGA thread does)
D


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist