On 5/20/06, Gerhard Fiedler <lists@connectionbrazil.com> wrote:
> I think the idea of using 10F parts as replacements for dedicated chips is
> pretty attractive, but it hangs on two issues (and IMO none has to do with
> programming the memory).
>

I think one thing is that 10F is not really that cheap after all. It really
has something to do with memory programming which adds to the
process time and production cost. Of course the reason of on chip
peripherals and  the cost of firmware developing you mentioned are
also big reasons.

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist