From: "Olin Lathrop"
> Padu wrote:
>> I liked the idea, except that I'll have to use a 12F because my
>> compiler does not support 10F,
>
> So don't use a compiler!  This kind of simple logic is probably easier to 
> do
> in assembly anyway.  The whole code will be a dozen or two instructions. 
> No
> matter how you slice it a couple dozen instructions just isn't going to be
> hard to write.


The 12F is not much more expensive than the 10F and it offers more features 
on an equally small package, so why not the 12F? I can still use my compiler 
to write 
ineffective-code-but-written-in-less-than-10-seconds-using-my-only-two-neurons 
approach. :-)

The problem with the PIC approach (as I found out yesterday night) is my old 
enemy: impedance matching. As soon as I connect my RF receiver to the PIC 
input, it loads it to the point that the signal high goes down to a few 
millivolts. I could use a voltage buffer, but then it's one more part. If 
possible, I wanted to use only one part...

Cheers

Padu 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist