Olin Lathrop wrote:

> Unless Russell can show that is has been proven insufficient, the "for
> sure" statement is just irresponsible science from somebody that should
> know better.

I generally read a "for sure" as synonymous for "I believe" or "IMO". This
seems a bit contradictory, as the "sure" in "for sure" seems to mean "I'm
/not/ sure", but I think that's how it's generally meant. Or am I mistaken
here?

Gerhard

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist