--- Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 4/12/06, Maarten Hofman <cashimor@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > kits are one of the better programmers out
> there.
> > > PICkit is so so but the user would soon out grow
> it.
> >
> >
> > Now I'm not saying anything about other
> programmers being better, as I am
> > sure there are better programmers out there, but
> I've had the PICkit 2 for
> > some time now, and doubt I will grow out of it
> soon. It does everything I
> > would ever want: ICSP and (using the demoboard and
> a board I created myself)
> > off-line programming of a wide range of PICmicros,
> which include all the
> > ones I have, and more. It is also fast enough (at
> least twice as fast as my
> > JDM programmer) and might be integrated with MPLAB
> as well. But I should
> > phrase this as a question: what makes the PICkit 2
> "so so" and cause users
> > to "soon out grow it"?
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Maarten Hofman.
> 
> I have PICkit 2 and I think PICkit 2 is quite good
> as well. It supports major
> PICs which new hobbyists should use. And new
> functionalities will be added
> to PICkit 2 later (like dsPIC programming). In fact
> I think it is one of the
> best ready-made PIC programmers.

  Is this for real Xiaofan? dsPIC programming for
PICKit2? Sigh..... I miss the sales.....


john

> 
> Regards,
> Xiaofan
> 
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist