--- Byron A Jeff wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:47:39AM -0400, Olin > Lathrop wrote: > > Byron A Jeff wrote: > > > Olin is absolutely right. I am the guilty party > in this story. I wanted > > > (and still do want) a cross platform programmer > for EasyProg. I did > > > promise to generate something in Python upon > delivery. And I have not > > > done so. > > > > Byron, I wasn't trying to single you out or name > names. > > I know you weren't. If you wanted to do that you > could have named names. > I chose to own up to the situation and proffer a > solution. > > > I understand what > > it's like where you think you want to do something > then reality and other > > issues get in the way. And you were only one of > about a half dozen people > > that received EasyProg prototypes. I'm not really > upset by this, just > > consider it a lesson learned about reality and > human nature. > > > > I'm still willing to support anyone with hardware > if they want to develop > > publicly available software, but I'm not just > going to give out the hardware > > and hope to get something in return. I don't have > a good idea however how > > to make the hardware available up front but still > have a guarantee I'll get > > something back. > > Simple. Don't do it. Offer the hardware at a > reasonable price and rebate > that cost if you do get something useful. Then the > recipient has to invest > in order to participate, and produce in order to > benefit. > > BAJ > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > One of the best idea's I could come up with is a contest. Offer a free programmer (or money back if someone bought one already) and perhaps a bonus board or so to the person or group that provides support or the best support. YMMV Peter van Hoof -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist