William ChopsWestfield wrote:

> On Apr 2, 2006, at 4:34 PM, Olin Lathrop wrote:
> 
>> If I had to pick one, I'd pick the otherwise unimpressive
>> TDS210 over the analog scope I have now for that reason.
> 
> I *LIKE* my TDS-210, and indeed the single-event capture has
> come in handy.  You can connect up an IR receiver and see the
> whole command from a remote control for instance...

I third that :)  The TDS210 are/were pretty good scopes for the money. The
only thing I really miss in it are isolated inputs (like the portable
scopes usually have). For who has that money to spend, that's IMO a very
useful feature. 

> I don't use it very often; perhaps I would find more things
> not to like about it if I did.  But so far, it's proven adequate
> for everything I've tried to use it for.

I use it quite a bit, in phases. But there isn't much -- anything, in fact
-- I could say I don't like about it. 

Gerhard

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist