Ok, I got it. Thanks to all ho have took the time to respond to my 
question ! Now I'm clearer and I will implement the solution proposed.

Best regards,
Lucian

Gerhard Fiedler wrote:

>Lucian Copat wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I am using PICC-18 8.35, but I would like to avoid declaring reentrant 
>>procedures. 
>>    
>>
>
>Why? After all, this is what you want. BTW, they are not really declared as
>being re-entrant, you just tell the compiler that you will take care that
>the routine will not be called from an interrupt thread while it's being
>run from the main thread.
>
>  
>
>>So there is not a *standard* way of treating this kind of interrupt ?
>>    
>>
>
>I'm not sure what you mean by "standard". A C compiler that uses a static
>stack and creates non-reentrant code is in that respect non-standard, so if
>you want that, you need to use a different compiler. However, such code on
>a PIC 18 is in general less efficient.
>
>OTOH, with PICC-18, declaring such a function in the appropriate way (that
>is, telling the compiler it is ok that it appears in both the main call
>tree and an interrupt call tree because you are taking care that it won't
>be in the routine in both threads at the same time) /is/ the standard way
>of treating this kind of situation.
>
>Gerhard
>
>  
>

-- 
*Lucian Copat
Software Team Leader
Audiotel Comlabs
E-mail: lucian.copat@audiotel.ro
Mobile: (+4)0722.729.658
Web: http://www.audiotel.ro*
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist