I'm a photocopier / printer tech from way back. About 15 years. I have worked on most high end brands in excess of 100 to 140 pages per minute. The ones you say, I would exclude (B...) as I have found them to be not easily repaired. If you can stay away from (X...), only because you will have to deal only with them, parts are expensive as well. The best advice I can offer is to look at (K... ) there costs are low, image quality exceptional and they rarely breakdown. I had one customer who's factory (huge in size, outlets Australia wide) had something like 200+ high end (K...) mix of digital black and colour as well as their printers. One machine I am thinking of, did just short of 900,000 on one maintenance kit. By this time the prints were still in good shape. The maintenance kit was installed as a preventative maintenance measure. And that's a point too, the maintenance kits, change everything, needed in the machines about every 300,000. So what I'm saying is they are worth a look into. Tone cost are also very low. I'm am not in that industry any more as my day job. But when I was we had an application program that could tell you the page coverage. So customers could be shown on their own printing/copying what the real world %... coverage was. I had a look but can't seem to locate the application. It worked on both black and colour. http://global.kyocera.com/ http://www.kyocera.com.au/copiers.asp Well that's my %5 percents worth anyway. :-) Peter Gerhard Fiedler wrote: >William ChopsWestfield wrote: > > > >>On Mar 30, 2006, at 3:19 AM, Russell McMahon wrote: >> >> >> >>>My question is, does anyone have *real world* figures for typical >>>percentage cover of typical printed pages. This is obviously highly >>>variable with application, but the very commonly quoted 5% figures >>>seems to be low. >>> >>> > > > >>However, all the cartridges are claiming to have a historical >>coverage of right around 5%. >> >> > >I printed a plain text document (reasonably full page) to a printer driver >with image writer function (FinePrint) and looked at the result with Paint >Shop Pro's histogram function. About 3.5% black pixels. > >I can easily repeat this, if you want to send me a few sample pages (e.g. >some PDFs). > >Gerhard > > > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist