On 3/18/06, Russell McMahon <apptech@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> Has anyone successfully heat sunk 1N400x diodes?
>
> Filtering out the
>
>    - add more copper
>    - change the orientation/location/...
>    - use larger diodes
>    - use a bridge
>    - use a fan
>    - liquid cool / heat pipe / transcendental meditation ...
>    - get a life ...
>
> responses :-)
>
> I'm actually interested in things done to get more heat out of 1N400x
> diodes.
> PCB copper is about at a maximum.
> Lead lengths are small (which is meant to be best)


On old TV receivers, switching diodes are heated using a copper
heatsink connected on anode (anyway on the terminal where silicium
chip is directly soldered -without any thin wire-, broke a diode and
see which is)
However using 1N400x in parallel is a curious thing for an old  capitalist...
:)
cheers,
Vasile


> They are where they are at present.
> They are operating within nominal spec but get far hotter than I'd
> like them to.
> (They handle under 1A mean but current is pulsed at rather more so
> heating is disproportionately high
>
> 16 diodes are in two parallel rows of 8
> I vaguely toyed with the idea of clamping a heatsink bar along a row.
> Contact an issue - thermal goo or conductive washer.
> Uneven mounting height an issue.
> I can imagine that even a very modestly sized an L or inverse T of
> aluminum in conduct with the diode bodies would offer far better
> cooling than at present.
>
> Coating in a thermally conductive compound that doesn't creep may
> assist. And may not.
>
> Thoughts? Experiences?
>
>
>        Russell McMahon
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist