On 3/10/06, Crist=F3v=E3o Dalla Costa <cdallacosta@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looking at the rather detailed ebay pictures I get the impression that it
> uses one of those USB-RS232 bridges and therefore it should be as slow as
> the RS232 ICS2s
>
> I've seen an ICD2 clone which used a 40 pin PIC18 to communicate via USB =
and
> pass the information to a PIC16 which is the proper ICD2 PIC. I guess that
> short of a PIC18 (which this circuit does not have) or a Cypress chip (wh=
ich
> aren't through hole) you're stuck with a FTDI bridge which is no better t=
han
> a RS232 connection to the computer since the ICD2 PIC still thinks it's
> talking to a serial port and is limited to the 57600 bps datarate.

On 486 maybe ?
230400 bps is the maximum speed on most P2 computers, and now P2 is history.
The limitation could be from ICD software ?

cheers,
Vasile

-- =

http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist