M Graff wrote:

> I wish the DNS SRV record would have taken off, because then I could use
> 	_http._tcp.flame.org. SRV 0 0 80 www.flame.org.
> in my DNS file and have those pesky clients who insist on assuming the 
> domain-is-the-web find the right place.
> 
> See http://www.dur.ac.uk/a.d.stribblehill/dns+srv.html for a decent summary of 
> what SRV records could be used for -- if only web clients all supported them.

SRV records were definitely an interesting idea... well, still are... 
that's not widely deployed or supported.

Nate
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist