On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Mike Hord wrote:

>> I don't understand how that point relates to what I said.  What part of it
>> are you saying seems to be incorrect?
>
> Only that hole size is unrelated to the stream path, which is
> counterintuitive.

The hole size is *very* related to the stream path. If you read my 
previous posting then you should know that a small hole with high 
pressure (=head height) will yield a fast stream that will break up and 
be strongly braked by air, thus not rising to the expected height.

Peter
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist