Wouter van Ooijen wrote:

> One step better, and one level up in the language picking order: I'd
> like to specify that, and not have to worry about how many instructions
> I spent doing those other things. And I want to be able to specify that
> in loops too. Does anyone know of a HLL syntax (or even an
> implementation) for this?

With a rather high overhead (between too high and much too high for the
typical applications we're talking about :), this is what a preemptive
realtime OS provides.

I don't know of any HLL that has support for timing at this level. 

Gerhard

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist