On 2/26/06, Spehro Pefhany wrote: \> There are *no* interrupts in the 12F509, primitive beast that it is. > > I think he'll have to do something like have the program sit and wait for > the timer to finish, or check and see if the timer has rolled over by > looking to see if the MSB has gone 1->0 (but of course you must check > frequently enough to ensure that you don't miss anything important). Whoops! Shows what I know! I might have been thinking of the 12F6XX series... Josh -- A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. -Douglas Adams -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist