John Nall wrote:

>Olin Lathrop wrote:
>  
>
>>The EasyProg and ProProg PIC programmers (http://www.embedinc.com/products)
>>now support the PICs in the subfamily containing the 18F6527.  Specifically,
>>support for the following PICs has been added: 18F6527, 18F6622, 18F6627,
>>18F6722, 18F8527, 18F8622, 18F8627, and 18F8722.
>>  
>>    
>>
>
>I suppose there is a really fine line between [AD] and [PIC] in this 
>particular case, since you are giving valuable information, but for a 
>product which you have a financial interest in.  But, IMHO, the former 
>would outweigh the latter, and it should be a PIC designation.  (This 
>assumes, of course, that most of the list does not subscribe to [AD], 
>which may be a false assumption).
>
>
>  
>
I think it should be under [PIC] anyway. Some PIC people might miss it 
as an ad.

--Bob

-- 
Note: To protect our network,
attachments must be sent to
attach@engineer.cotse.net .
1-520-850-1673 USA/Canada
http://beam.to/azengineer

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist