Barry Callahan <barryc <at> rjlsystems.com> writes:

> 
> subject=Re:[PIC:] Tiny PIC Bootloader and 18f2620
> source= http://www.piclist.com/piclist/2006/02/15/150425a.txt?
> 
> "AFAIK, all bottlodaers will require modification of the target 
> application code, since vectors have to be relocated."
> 
> Actually, that's not true. CodeLoader and Tiny both overwrite the 
> interrupt vector(s) with those of the application code. (neither of them 
> relies on interrupts themselves) The reset vector doesn't get relocated 
> because you always want the bootloader code to execute first on reset.

Barry, You are right. I should have expressed myself better.  From the 
application point of view, it (application) has to relocate reset vector to 
allow bootloader to execute on reset.
Sergey


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist