This is an interesting scenario.  Let me explain why.  If you commit a crime
and the court accepts that you have multiple personalities and therefore
you're not convicted on the basis of legal insanity, they're basically saying
that your insanity IS in fact PROOF.  In your scenario, it can still be proof,
I think it is just a matter of finding the right lawyer for the job.

Good luck and let us know how you make out =)

-mmj

> For over 20 years I have dreamed of suing myself.  I want to take
> out some liability insurance and make sure I have no assets.  Then
> my multiple personalities take over.  Bad Boy #1 makes me do things
> like spill hot coffee on my lap or write a litigious article about
> myself.
> Angel Lad #2 is so traumatized by these activities that he sues Bad Boy
> #1, who admits his guilt and throws himself on the mercy of the court.
> AL#2 promises to take care of the repentant and cowed and non-functional
> BB#1 with the money that insurance company is morally obligated to
> koff up.
> ( I would think 2 mil would be fair )
> I love the idea of the court room scene where BB#1 and AL#2 are
> questioned.
> AGSC
>
> On 2006-Feb 02, at 3:51 PM, Mario Mendes Jr. wrote:
>
> Yeah, I've been thinking of poking myself in the eye with a screwdriver
> and filing a class-action law suit against the manufacturer of said
> screwdriver for not putting a big glow-in-the-dark sticker on its handle
> to tell me that it was not meant for any other use other than tightening
> and loosening screws.  Anyone of you who owns a screwdriver can profit
> from this too.  Who's with me?  Now where's that phonebook?  I need to
> find myself a low life lawyer (no offense to any lawyers in the list's
> audience, of course).
>
>
>
>
> -mmj
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf
> Of Danny Sauer
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 5:05 PM
> To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public.
> Subject: Re: [OT] Cleaning fluid
>
>
> Microcontroller wrote regarding 'Re: [OT] Cleaning fluid' on Thu, Feb 02
> at 15:44:
>> VULCAN20 wrote regarding 'Re: [OT] Cleaning fluid' on Thu, Feb 02 at
>> 15:25:
>>> Do not forget about the "Finger in the Wendys chili lawsuit"  Turned
>
>>> out
>>> the husband got the finger at work where some one got it cut off.
>>
>> I guess I should've referred to those people as the "it's everyone
>> else's responsibility to get me what I want through any means but hard
>
>> work" group rather than the "It's not my fault" group.  My bad. :)
>> I'll work harder to better include liars with idiots in the future.
>
> Today's example - man sues Apple because he lost some hearing from
> listening to iPod too loudly.  http://tinyurl.com/arawo
>
> --Danny, only posting all this junk because multicast system imaging
> just isn't working right, and it's easier to waste list bandwidth than
> to figure out what's wrong with this experimental multicast daemon
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist