Yes, the PIC16C84 was an experiment by Microchip.

--Bob

Wouter van Ooijen wrote:

>>>The 16C84 is a naming error. It is, for all practical purposes, an F
>>>chip.
>>>      
>>>
>>In what respect ?
>>    
>>
>
>It can be electrically re-programmed, using algorithms and hardware that
>programs 16F chips. All other C chips are EPROM chips: either
>program-once (OTP), or windowed (for development, use an UV-eraser to
>erase).
>
>Wouter van Ooijen
>
>-- -------------------------------------------
>Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
>consultancy, development, PICmicro products
>docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu
> 
>
>  
>


-- 
Note: To protect our network,
attachments must be sent to
attach@engineer.cotse.net .
1-520-850-1673 USA/Canada
http://beam.to/azengineer

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist